A Presentation for the Global Solidarity Movement with the Zapatista Communities:
Friends, family, and sisters and brothers of the Americanas Zapatistas:
Americanas Zapatistas! - documents the moment when patience ends and new worlds begin. —where “¡Se acabó!” becomes both; an ending and a creation. This is a reflective blog exploring Zapatista philosophy, autonomy, and resistance across the Americas. It blends history, activism, and vision to imagine a society where the power of care replaces the power of control.
A Presentation for the Global Solidarity Movement with the Zapatista Communities:
Friends, family, and sisters and brothers of the Americanas Zapatistas:
A Presentation for the Global Solidarity Movement with the Zapatista Communities:
Friends, family, and sisters and brothers of the Americanas Zapatistas:
The Sacrifice of the Base
Imagine a pyramid. For centuries, it has been the shape of power in Mexico. It is grand, it is imposing, but it is also truncated. Its very design requires a sacrifice at the top to maintain the structure below. From the days of the Mexica to the modern presidency, this verticality has defined our reality. But today, a new architect has taken the stage, promising to dismantle the pyramid while secretly reinforcing its stones with the cold cement of global capital.
The Illusion of the "Left"
We are often told that Mexico is undergoing a "Fourth Transformation," a progressive revolution for the poor. But Arturo Anguiano, a voice of profound critical thought speaking from the heart of Zapatista territory, invites us to look closer. He suggests that what we are witnessing is not a shift to the left, but the emergence of "The Other Right." In this video, recorded in December 2025 [09:51],
Anguiano pulls back the curtain on the "progressive" mask. He argues that the current regime is not a nostalgic return to revolutionary nationalism, but a modern, neoliberal administration of capitalism. It is a "mercantilism of politics" where social programs are not tools of liberation, but mechanisms of clientelism—buying loyalty while the fundamental structures of inequality remain untouched [51:05].
The Personalist Machine
One of the most striking revelations in Anguiano’s analysis is the nature of the ruling party, Morena. He describes it not as a social movement, but as a "personalist party" [32:32].
It is an organization with no collective direction, no internal debate, and no real volunteers—only a payroll of "Servants of the Nation" who operate as a semi-state machinery [36:58].
This centralization has led to what he calls a despotic regime [59:43].
The separation of powers is becoming a myth. The judiciary is under siege. The "imaginary republic" is being replaced by a reality where the president’s word is the only law that matters, justified by a "blank check" from the voters that is used to ignore the very people who provided it [38:39].
The Neo-Colonial Scalpel
For those of us in global solidarity, the most alarming part of this presentation is the discussion of "neo-colonial" infrastructure [01:18:46].
Projects like the Tren Maya and the Interoceanic Corridor are presented as national triumphs, but Anguiano exposes them as "dry canals of Panama"—arteries designed to move global merchandise from China to the U.S. East Coast [01:19:07].
These are not projects for the people; they are concessions to global finance, carving through indigenous territories and "razing the land" under the watchful eye of a newly militarized state [58:27].
So, where is the hope?
The Mountain’s Response: Autonomy from Below
It lies in the metaphor of the mountain. While the pyramid represents the state and its sacrifices, the mountain represents the assembly of original peoples—the "assembly of pyramids" that Octavio Paz once spoke of, reimagined through Zapatista resistance [03:35].
Anguiano reminds us that "the state will not fall on its own; it must be dismantled from below" [01:13:34].
The Zapatista movement provides the blueprint: not seeking the power of the pyramid, but building a different kind of power—one that is rooted in autonomy, self-governance, and a refusal to be assimilated into the "logic of the serpent" [05:46].
The Call to Action
To our sisters and brothers in the Americanas Zapatistas: this video is more than a political lecture. It is a warning. It is a call to recognize that "progressivism" can often be the most effective mask for "capitalism in its extreme form" [29:00].
Watch this presentation. Listen to the breakdown of how the military has been integrated into the very fabric of the economy [58:53].
Understand how "austerity" is being used as a tool to shrink the state’s responsibility to the people while expanding its capacity for accumulation [44:41].
Mexico, as Anguiano says, is a country that has "lost its soul" and requires a new one [00:27].
That soul will not be found in the National Palace; it will be found in the mountains, in the communities, and in the global solidarity of those who refuse to be sacrificed for the top of the pyramid.
Watch the full presentation here:
Participación de Arturo Anguiano, 29 de Diciembre de 2025
A Presentation for the Global Solidarity Movement with the Zapatista Communities:
Friends, family, and sisters and brothers of the Americanas Zapatistas:
We stand at a crossroads in history where the old ways of "commanding" are being dissolved into the new ways of "sharing." In this profound video, recorded on December 28, 2025, Subcomandante Insurgente Moisés of the EZLN brings us a message that is both a report from the front lines of autonomy and a manual for the future of global resistance. It is a message that begins, surprisingly, with a laugh.
1. The Rebel Heart: Why We Laugh
Subcomandante Moisés opens his talk by reminding us that for the Zapatista movement, rebellion is not just about the struggle; it is about the joy of it [00:21].
He speaks of "clown-like rebellion" as a way to clear the mind—to find the humanity that the system tries to strip away. This is our first lesson: if we are to resist a system that seeks to demoralize and divide us [03:16],
"We must do so,
with a spirit that cannot be broken!"
2. The Great Shift: From the Individual to "The Common"
The heart of this presentation is the transition to what the Zapatistas call "El Común" (The Common). Moisés explains that this is not just a political theory; it is a way of relating to the land and to each other [10:41].
He challenges the very concept of private property, asking a powerful question to those who claim to "own" a piece of land: "How many millions of years is your life?" [13:48].
Since our lives are but a blink compared to the Earth, how can we claim to own her? Instead, we belong to her. This realization has led the Zapatista communities to restructure their entire governance into three levels of horizontal authority:
3. "The People Truly Rule": The End of the Pyramid
For years, the world has heard the Zapatista slogan "Mandar Obedeciendo" (To Lead by Obeying). In this video, Moisés describes the practical evolution of this principle. They have dismantled the "pyramid" structure—even their own previous councils—to ensure that decision-making power resides at the base [49:15].
He shares honest, often humorous stories of the growing pains of this system: how Zapatistas and non-Zapatista "brothers and sisters" (formerly known as partidistas) are learning to work the land together [12:14].
He speaks of resolving conflicts in the moment, in the field, rather than waiting for a distant authority to intervene [18:37].
This is the "Common" in practice—a tool that even saves the lives of those displaced by organized crime or natural disasters [43:22], [45:12].
4. The Future: Organizing the Youth
Perhaps the most urgent part of the message is the call to organize the youth [59:18].
Moisés warns that "the future" is not a given; it is something that must be organized. Without a collective path, the future will be dictated by the same capitalist forces we fight today. By involving young people in El Común, the Zapatistas are ensuring that the seeds of autonomy will continue to grow for the next 120 years and beyond.
5. A Message for Global Solidarity
To the Americanas Zapatistas and all those in global solidarity: this video is a reminder that resistance is not a static state, but a constant practice of "sharing" (compartición) [08:24].
It is about learning from each other's mistakes and successes without competition.
Moisés leaves us with a profound metric for our work: "If the enemy applauds us, we are doing something wrong; if the enemy hates us, it means we are on the right path" [03:55].
Let us take this message to heart. Let us look to the Zapatistas not as a distant ideal, but as a living example of how to build a world where many worlds fit—a world where, finally, the people truly rule [59:57].
Watch the full message here:
PARTICIPACIÓN DEL SUBCOMANDANTE INSURGENTE MOISÉS, 28 DE DICIEMBRE DE 2025
Reclaiming History from Below:
The Story They Told Us is a Lie
A Presentation for the Global Solidarity Movement with the Zapatista Communities:
Friends, family, and sisters and brothers of the Americanas Zapatistas
Reclaiming History
We are often told that history is a settled record—a museum of statues and dates. But as we see in this "Semillero" convened by the Zapatistas [10:57],
history is not a graveyard;
it is a battlefield.
In this session, Raúl Romero and Carlos Aguirre Rojas take us on a journey to understand how those at the top of the "pyramid" use history as a weapon. For the state, history is a tool of legitimacy. They take our heroes, strip them of their radicalism, and put them on banknotes to tell us that the "Revolution" has already ended, and they are its heirs [26:12].
But Romero reminds us of the "pueblos without history"—the communities that the colonial and neocolonial powers tried to erase [18:47].
He speaks of the 1712 Tzeltal rebellion and the Seri insurrections—voices that the official history books refuse to name [24:19].
The lesson for us is clear: When a people loses its history, it loses its identity. And a people without identity is a people easily conquered [20:05].
The Science of Truth vs. The Trap of "Decoloniality"
Carlos Aguirre Rojas pushes the conversation further. He challenges us to look beyond the "hard words" of academia [01:12:44].
While the current "progressive" governments in Latin America use the language of "decoloniality" to ask for apologies from the Pope or the King of Spain for crimes committed 500 years ago, they simultaneously repress, despoil, and silence the indigenous peoples of today [01:26:59].
Rojas argues that true history belongs to the people who build the world—the ones who make the factories run and the fields grow [01:34:51].
This is the wisdom of experience. While the elite provide a history that is 90% lie, the people hold a history that is 90% truth because they are the ones living it [01:34:09].
He takes us back to a pivotal moment: December 1914. For a brief window, the popular armies of Villa and Zapata controlled Mexico City [01:49:02].
He asks a haunting "what if": What if they had marched on and built a radical peasant republic? The entire history of the 20th century, and the global dominance of U.S. imperialism, might have looked different [01:50:39].
This "interrupted revolution" is a reminder that the future is never written in stone; it is always open to the organized and the brave.
Autonomy as the New World
The Zapatistas are not just theorizing; they are building. Through their concept of "el común" (the common) and the non-property of the people, they are showing that a non-capitalist world is not a dream—it is a reality in the mountains of Southeast Mexico [01:53:35].
They have replaced the hierarchy of the doctor with the "health promoter" and the authority of the teacher with the "education promoter" [01:32:30].
They are teaching us that to survive the "storm" of the "hydra" (capitalism), we must look long-term—prepared to fight for 120 years if that is what it takes [01:52:16].
A Story of Love and Heartbreak
The video concludes with a lighter, yet equally sharp, touch: a story about Dení, a first-generation Zapatista girl [01:58:21].
Through the lens of childhood, we see the Zapatista ethic: a deep suspicion of those who seek individual glory over collective liberation, and a recommendation to always have a way to escape the traps of "patriarchal" or "state-led" love [02:02:44].
Our Call to Solidarity
To the communities in resistance across the Americas: This video is your mirror. It asks you to be the "archivist of your own rebellion." It asks you to doubt the "history from above" and to trust in the collective intelligence of your neighbors.
We don't need titles to be wise. We only need the memory of our struggles and the courage to plant the seeds of a world where many worlds fit.
Watch the full video and join the "Semillero" here:
SEMILLERO “DE PIRÁMIDES, DE HISTORIAS, DE AMORES Y, CLARO, DESAMORES”, 27 de diciembre 2025
To Scrub the Future:
A Seedbed of Resistance and the Call to "The Common"
A Presentation for the Global Solidarity Movement with the Zapatista Communities:
Friends, family, and sisters and brothers of the Americanas Zapatistas
Scrubbing the Future
Friends, companions, and sisters of the Americanas Zapatistas and all those standing in the currents of global solidarity: imagine a room where thirty-eight different geographies meet, not to draft a policy paper, but to plant a seed [02:58].
We are not here to talk about "saving" a world that is already crumbling; we are here to talk about what it means to build a new one from the soil up.
In this recent gathering of the Zapatista Semillero (the Seedbed), titled "Of Pyramids, of Stories, of Loves and, Of Course, Heartbreaks," the Zapatista leadership—including Subcomandante Insurgente Moisés and the Captain—delivered a message that is both a warning and a profound invitation to those of us in the North and South who believe in autonomy.
The Two Storms
We often hear about the "crisis" of our times, but the Zapatistas describe it more vividly: we are facing two simultaneous storms [01:10:50].
The first is the "Mother Pyramid" of the capitalist system—a machine of destruction that functions automatically and cannot be humanized, paused, or controlled by AI [54:27].
It is a system that views the world as a reordered territory to be depopulated and rebuilt for profit [39:44].
The second storm is the reaction of Mother Earth herself [01:44:06].
This isn't just "climate change" in an academic sense; it is the physical wounding of the earth for minerals and oil, a "bestiality" that the Zapatistas argue no government or "civilized" institution can stop. [01:42:22].
The Syndrome of the "Magical Detergent"
Perhaps the most stinging and necessary part of this message for our solidarity communities is what the Captain calls the "Chaca-Chaca" syndrome [44:55].
He recalls an old soap advertisement where a detergent promised to turn any bucket into an electric washing machine just by making the sound—chaca-chaca [45:31].
He challenges us: are we waiting for a political leader, a "progressive" government, or a new party to be our magical detergent? [48:10].
We sit by our "buckets" (our organizations, our movements) and give the "benefit of the doubt" to institutions, hoping they will do the work for us [49:04].
But as the Zapatistas remind us, there is no magic. If you want the clothes clean, you have to "tallar"—you have to scrub [49:33].
You have to struggle,
and
you have to organize in common.
From Property to "The Common"
The Zapatistas are moving into a new phase of their journey: the transition from "autonomous rebel municipalities" to the "Common" (el común) [01:10:34].
This is a radical departure from the concept of private property. Subcomandante Moisés shares that by looking back at the history of their ancestors—those who lived before money was "the thing that gives life"—they rediscovered the power of the montón, or the "common" [01:36:24].
Their ancestors didn't just escape the plantation owners individually; they escaped in groups, defending themselves and working the land as one. This is the blueprint for the "day after" the capitalist collapse: a world where we say "No to property, yes to the common" [01:47:42].
It is a call to govern ourselves not through a small group of "experts" in a pyramid, but as a whole people who watch over one another [02:08:13].
Loves and Heartbreaks
The title of this talk refers to "loves and heartbreaks," and it carries a beautiful lesson for our movements. In the Zapatista worldview, love is what makes us "complete" (cabal) [01:04:01].
But love isn't just about couples; it’s about the relationship between ourselves, nature, and the "different other."
They tell us that "making a love" is synonymous with "making another world" [01:05:33].
When that vision fails or remains static, we become "incomplete," and the "heartbreak" of the system returns. This cycle of completing and incompleting is what creates history. It’s why there is a "tomorrow"—because something is always missing, and that missing piece is our collective action [01:05:51].
A Call to the Americanas Zapatistas
To our communities in the United States and across the Americas: the Zapatistas aren't asking for our "academic alibis" or our social media trends [18:37]
They are asking us to look at our own histories—to find the "common" in our own geographies [02:11:48].
They don't want to export their theory; they want us to practice our own. As Subcomandante Moisés says, "We don't want to study how the system dominates us anymore... we are worried about what the change is, what is the new thing we are going to make, and let it be practical" [02:13:23].
So, let us stop waiting for the "magical detergent." Let us pick up our own buckets, find our own común, and start scrubbing the future together. Because in the end, it’s not money that gives life; it’s the bridge we build between our yesterday and our today to give birth to a tomorrow [01:06:07].
Video Source:
SEMILLERO “DE PIRÁMIDES, DE HISTORIAS, DE AMORES Y, CLARO, DESAMORES”, 26 de diciembre 2025
Standing at the Fork in the Road:
How Communities Can Thrive After the Economy We Know Breaks
Good evening, friends, neighbors, and fellow humans trying to make sense of a strange moment in history.
Let me start with something simple—and uncomfortable:
The economy we grew up with is not coming back.
Not because we failed.
Not because we didn’t work hard enough.
But because it was built on assumptions that no longer hold: infinite growth, infinite energy, infinite stability, and someone else always being in charge.
That doesn’t mean the future is hopeless.
It means the future is local.
When people hear “collapse,” they imagine chaos, Mad Max, fear, survivalism.
That’s not how collapse actually works.
Collapse is usually quieter than that. It looks like:
Systems that sort of work… until they don’t.
Institutions that exist on paper but not in practice.
Money that still circulates, but buys less trust every year.
Jobs that don’t cover life.
Services that become conditional, delayed, or unavailable.
Collapse is not one moment.
It’s a long unraveling.
And here’s the key insight:
The opposite of collapse is not growth.
The opposite of collapse is relationship.
Before there were markets, there were people.
Before contracts, there were promises.
Before currencies, there were favors.
Before banks, there were neighbors.
Money is not value.
Money is a symbol of value.
And when symbols fail, societies don’t disappear.
They revert to older, deeper technologies:
Cooperation
Reciprocity
Shared responsibility
Local knowledge
Mutual aid
These are not nostalgic ideas.
They are battle-tested survival systems older than civilization itself.
This is important.
Preparing for a post-collapse economy is not about:
Rejecting technology
Abandoning modern knowledge
Romanticizing hardship
Pretending the past was better
It’s about changing what we optimize for.
The industrial economy optimized for:
Efficiency over resilience
Scale over care
Growth over continuity
Profit over people
A post-collapse economy optimizes for:
Resilience over efficiency
Sufficiency over excess
Relationship over extraction
Continuity over growth
Different values create different systems.
Here’s a truth most policy discussions avoid:
When global systems weaken, local systems matter more.
Food becomes local.
Energy becomes local.
Care becomes local.
Decision-making becomes local.
Not because it’s trendy.
Because it’s reliable.
The communities that will suffer least are not the richest ones.
They are the ones that can answer basic questions together:
Who grows food here?
Who fixes things?
Who knows the land?
Who cares for children, elders, and the sick?
How do we make decisions when no one is coming to help?
Those are economic questions.
They just don’t show up on stock tickers.
Let’s make this concrete.
A post-collapse economy is not one system.
It’s a mesh.
It includes:
Formal money and informal exchange
Businesses and cooperatives
Skills and relationships
Trade and gift economies
Some examples you can imagine right now:
A local repair culture where broken things are resources, not trash
Skill-sharing networks where knowledge circulates without permission
Community land trusts protecting housing from speculation
Local food webs instead of single supply chains
Time banks, mutual credit, or local exchange systems
Shared tools, shared spaces, shared responsibility
This isn’t radical.
It’s what humans do when systems thin out.
Let me say this plainly:
You cannot out-prepare collapse with supplies alone.
You can have food, tools, generators—and still fail if:
No one trusts each other
Conflict escalates unchecked
Decisions are centralized and brittle
Knowledge is hoarded
Care work is invisible
The strongest communities are not the most armed.
They are the most connected.
Social trust is infrastructure.
Story is infrastructure.
Care is infrastructure.
Conflict resolution is infrastructure.
If your town has those, it already has a foundation.
Large systems govern by distance.
Local systems govern by presence.
In a post-collapse economy:
Leadership rotates
Decisions are contextual
Elders matter
Lived experience matters
Feedback loops are short
This isn’t chaos.
It’s adaptive governance.
The question shifts from:
“Who’s in charge?”
To:
“Who is responsible for what—and accountable to whom?”
That shift alone changes everything.
Every economy encodes values.
The old economy asked:
How much can we extract?
How fast can we grow?
Who can we externalize costs onto?
The emerging economy asks:
How do we care for what cares for us?
What is enough?
How do we stay human under pressure?
This is not about being perfect.
It’s about being appropriate to the moment.
Here’s the part people don’t expect:
A post-collapse economy can be more humane than the one we’re leaving.
Slower—but more meaningful.
Smaller—but more alive.
Less abstract—but more real.
People often say:
“I just want things to go back to normal.”
But for many, normal was:
Precarious
Lonely
Exhausting
Disconnected from land and meaning
We don’t need to recreate the past.
We need to build something honest enough to survive the future.
So here is the invitation—not to panic, not to retreat, not to wait.
Start asking different questions together:
What do we already have?
Who already knows how to do what we need?
What relationships need strengthening now, not later?
What can we practice locally before we’re forced to?
Collapse does not reward speed.
It rewards preparedness, humility, and cooperation.
And the most powerful move a community can make right now is simple:
Turn toward each other.
That’s not idealism.
That’s strategy.
Thank you.
-----
Source:
Premise:
A synopsis of the architecture of self-management, self-directed autonomy
in the context of developing local regional autonomy as a community response to post-collapse society
---
In a post-collapse scenario, the transition from centralized state reliance to local regional autonomy requires a shift from hierarchical control to horizontal self-management. This architecture isn't just about survival; it’s about creating a "steady-state" social ecosystem that can govern itself without external inputs.
Here is a synopsis of the architectural layers required for self-directed community autonomy.
1. The Decision-Making Layer: Fractal Democracy
To maintain autonomy, power must reside at the most local level possible (subsidiarity). Instead of a top-down command, the architecture uses a Fractal or Nested Council system.
* Affinity Groups: Small units (5–20 people) who handle immediate daily tasks and hold high levels of interpersonal trust.
* Spokes-Councils: Regional assemblies where delegates from affinity groups meet to coordinate large-scale needs (watershed management, defense) without yielding permanent power.
* Consensus-Based Protocols: Rather than simple majority rule—which creates "winners" and "losers"—self-management often relies on modified consensus to ensure all voices are heard, maintaining community cohesion.
2. The Resource Layer: The Commons and Circularity
Post-collapse autonomy fails if the community depends on external supply chains. The architecture must be built on The Commons.
* Usufruct Rights: Land and tools are "owned" by those who use them, preventing the accumulation of idle resources while others go without.
* Resource Mapping: A rigorous inventory of local "bioregional" assets—potable water, clay for building, timber, and caloric potential of the land.
* Open-Source Hardware: Utilizing "appropriate technology" that can be repaired, manufactured, and maintained locally using modular designs (e.g., Global Village Construction Set).
3. The Economic Layer: Mutualism and Credit
Traditional currency often disappears or hyper-inflates during collapse. A self-managed region requires internal exchange mechanisms that prioritize mutual aid.
* Time Banks: Exchanging labor based on time spent rather than market value, ensuring that "care work" is valued equally to "construction work."
* Mutual Credit Unions: Bookkeeping systems where the community issues its own credit based on its productive capacity, bypassing the need for a central bank.
* Labor Contributions: A "gift economy" approach for essential needs (food, water), supplemented by trade for non-essentials.
4. The Security Layer: Community Defense and Justice
Self-management requires protecting the autonomy of the region without recreating a professional, oppressive police force.
* Transformative Justice: Moving away from punitive systems (jails) toward mediation and restitution to resolve internal conflicts and maintain social fabric.
* Dual Power: The community maintains its own infrastructure to the point where external "authorities" become irrelevant.
* Non-Hierarchical Defense: Rotating security duties among members to prevent the formation of a separate "warrior class" that might seize political control.
5. The Psychological Layer: Radical Pedagogy
The hardest part of the architecture is the "human hardware." People raised in centralized systems must "unlearn" dependency.
* Skill-Sharing: Continuous workshops to ensure no single individual holds a monopoly on "critical knowledge" (e.g., medicine or engineering).
* Emotional Resilience: Practices for collective trauma processing, which is inevitable in a post-collapse environment.
> Concept: This architecture is modular. If one regional community fails or is compromised, the others remain functional because they are not dependent on a central "hub.">
Resources:
https://failfastmoveon.blogspot.com/2016/07/the-relationship-between-self.html
![]() |
Introduction
The video presents a university lecture by Dr. Roy Casagranda on the subject of **modern political ideologies**. Rather than treating ideology as a set of abstract doctrines to be memorized, the lecture approaches ideology as a **historical, psychological, and social phenomenon**—something that arises from human needs, emotions, and material conditions. The central goal of the lecture is to help students understand *why ideologies exist, how they function, and why they so often lead to conflict*, even when they claim to promote order or justice.
Throughout the lecture, Dr. Casagranda combines history, political theory, psychology, and moral reflection. The tone is explanatory rather than partisan, and the structure moves from foundational concepts to historical examples and finally to contemporary implications.
Ideology as a Human Construct
Early in the lecture, Dr. Casagranda establishes that **ideologies are not neutral descriptions of reality**. Instead, they are simplified systems of meaning that help large groups of people interpret the world and coordinate action. Ideologies reduce complexity by offering narratives—stories about who “we” are, who “they” are, what is wrong with the world, and what must be done to fix it.
He emphasizes that this simplification is not accidental or malicious by default. Human beings are cognitively limited, and modern societies are vast and complex. Ideology emerges as a *coping mechanism* that allows people to act collectively without needing full knowledge of every issue. In this sense, ideology is presented as **functional**, even when it is inaccurate or incomplete.
The Psychological Dimension of Ideology
A major portion of the lecture focuses on **human psychology**. Dr. Casagranda explains that political behavior is not driven primarily by rational analysis. Instead, emotions—especially fear, belonging, pride, and resentment—play a dominant role in shaping beliefs.
He discusses how the human brain evolved to prioritize survival and group loyalty, not objective truth. As a result, ideologies often appeal to identity and emotion rather than evidence. This explains why people frequently cling to ideological beliefs even when confronted with contradictory facts. The lecture makes clear that this tendency is not a moral failing of individuals but a structural feature of human cognition.
This psychological framing helps students understand why ideological conflict is so persistent and why persuasion through logic alone often fails.
Nationalism and Group Identity
The lecture then turns to **nationalism** as a key modern ideology. Dr. Casagranda distinguishes between simple attachment to one’s homeland and nationalism as an ideology that elevates the nation to an almost sacred status. Nationalism, he explains, constructs a shared identity that binds people emotionally, often by defining outsiders as threats.
Historically, nationalism played a crucial role in mobilizing populations during periods of political fragmentation and external danger. However, the lecture also highlights the dangers of nationalism when it becomes exclusionary or absolutist. By framing political problems as conflicts between inherently different groups, nationalism can justify violence and suppress internal dissent.
Liberalism, Socialism, and Communism
The lecture proceeds to examine **liberalism**, **socialism**, and **communism** as responses to the transformations of the modern world, particularly industrialization and capitalism.
Rather than portraying these ideologies as purely theoretical systems, Dr. Casagranda situates them in their historical contexts. Each ideology is shown to be an attempt to solve real problems faced by real people at specific moments in history.
Fascism and Reactionary Ideologies
The lecture also addresses **fascism**, framing it as a reactionary ideology that emerges during periods of social instability and perceived humiliation. Fascism promises order, unity, and restored greatness, often by glorifying authority and suppressing pluralism.
Dr. Casagranda explains that fascism thrives on emotional intensity and mythic narratives rather than rational policy debate. It draws strength from fear and resentment, offering simple explanations and decisive action in moments of crisis. This section of the lecture underscores how ideologies can become dangerous when they claim absolute authority and reject moral or empirical limits.
Ideology and Political Participation
A recurring theme throughout the lecture is the relationship between ideology and **mass participation** in politics. In modern democracies, political success depends less on convincing people through detailed policy arguments and more on motivating them emotionally to act—especially to vote.
Dr. Casagranda notes that this dynamic incentivizes political movements to simplify messages, amplify fears, and frame opponents as existential threats. Ideology thus becomes a tool for mobilization rather than deliberation, contributing to polarization and misunderstanding.
Contemporary Ideological Confusion
In the latter part of the lecture, attention shifts to the present. Dr. Casagranda suggests that traditional ideological categories are breaking down. Many contemporary political movements borrow elements from multiple ideologies, while public discourse increasingly revolves around identity and emotion rather than coherent philosophical frameworks.
This creates a situation in which people feel deeply committed to political positions without being able to clearly articulate their underlying principles. The lecture presents this as a symptom of ideological exhaustion rather than ideological clarity.
Ethical Reflection and Conclusion
The lecture concludes with a normative reflection. Dr. Casagranda encourages humility in political engagement, reminding students that no ideology fully captures the complexity of human life. He argues for moving beyond mere tolerance toward a genuine appreciation of human diversity, while still acknowledging the inevitability of disagreement.
Rather than calling for the abandonment of ideology, the lecture calls for **conscious engagement with it**—recognizing its power, its limits, and its capacity for harm as well as good.
Conclusion
In summery: the video presents a rich, interdisciplinary examination of modern ideologies. It portrays ideology as a human-made system that arises from psychological needs and historical pressures, functions to organize collective action, and often distorts reality in the process. By grounding ideological conflict in human nature and social conditions, the lecture provides students with tools to understand political disagreement without reducing it to ignorance or malice.
The overall message is neither cynical nor utopian. Instead, it is a call for awareness: ideologies matter because humans matter, and understanding how ideologies work is essential for navigating the modern political world responsibly.
---
CALL FOR THE RESISTANCES AND REBELLIONS MEETING
«SOME PARTS OF THE WHOLE.»
June 2025.
To the individuals, groups, collectives, organizations, and movements that have signed the Declaration for Life:
The Zapatista communities of Mayan roots, through their Local Autonomous Government (GAL), Collective of Autonomous Governments (CGAZ), Assemblies of Collectives of Autonomous Government (ACGAZ), INTERZONA, and the EZLN, address you to:
Call upon individuals, groups, collectives, movements, and organizations that, in different corners of the world, resist and rebel against one or all of the heads of the capitalist Hydra, and that have a practice to share, to tell their story at a meeting with the Zapatista communities.
The invitation is for you to share your experience and proposals in the anti-system struggle according to your time, geography, and methods. Several hundred Zapatistas (men, women, “otr@s” (others), children, and elderly) from the various work groups, commissions, and responsibilities within the Zapatista autonomy and community will attend in person to listen to you and learn from you.
For this reason, we ask you to find words that can be understood. Because if you come here and only use harsh words, it’s for nothing, because we won’t understand you. We are confident that we will be an attentive and respectful collective listener. For this very reason, we hope that your words will be collective, clear, and understandable to those of us who invite you.
Likewise, the Zapatista people will explain to you, using the means the communities decide, the stage we are in, the problems we face, the progress or setbacks we see.
Anyone from an organization, group, collective, or movement who is willing and able to attend is welcome, although only one person, or several, will share their experience in turn. Media presence will not be permitted unless authorized by those presenting their practice.
Some topics are:
This is not a meeting for analysis or theoretical approaches, but rather a meeting of practical experiences of resistance. Those of us who will be there already know what the damned system is and what it does against everyone, as well as against nature, knowledge, the arts, information, human dignity, and the entire planet. This is not about theoretically exposing the evils of the capitalist system, but rather about what is being done to resist and rebel, that is, to fight against it.
We are not inviting you to teach. We are not your students or apprentices; nor are we teachers or tutors. We are, along with you, parts of a whole that opposes a system. You give, we givie. You tell us your experiences, and we, the Zapatista people, tell you ours.
The meeting will be at the Comandanta Ramona Seedbed in the Caracol of Morelia (where the Meetings of Women in Struggle were held).
The dates are August 2-17, 2025.
Arrival and check-in on the 2nd, opening on the 3rd, and closing on the 16th. Departure on the 17th.
Participant and attendee registration is via email:
@participantesencuentroagosto25@gmail.com
@asistentesencuentroagosto25@gmail.com
Note: The Zapatista presentations will be open to participants and attendees. Every effort will be made to broadcast these talks live and, if necessary, post the videos on the Enlace Zapatista website.
More details in future texts.
We remind you that the production, sale, and consumption of alcohol and drugs are NOT permitted. Neither is verbal or physical violence based on gender, race, size, color, religion, nationality, social position, terrain of resistance, or any other reason you may have.
There will be a roof to shelter you from the rain or sun, whichever the case.
We look forward to seeing you.
From the mountains of the Mexican Southeast.
Subcomandante Insurgente Moisés.
Mexico, June 2025.
Source: Iww forum :
What does rebellion look like when it grows up?
Today’s topic—“Who Rebels? The Americanas Zapatistas!”—isn’t just a slogan. It’s a call to wakefulness. A flare in the night. A reminder that rebellion isn’t a relic sealed in 20th-century amber. It’s alive. It’s evolving. And it’s showing up in places most people don’t expect.
Let’s start with the obvious echo: “Zapatistas.”
When most folks hear the name, they think of Chiapas in ’94—masks, mountains, indigenous autonomy, and the refusal to bow to a world that treats human beings like disposable inputs. But the deeper meaning—the part that matters today—is that a Zapatista is anyone who chooses dignity over convenience, community over extraction, and freedom over the quiet suffocation of resignation.
So who are the Americanas Zapatistas?
They’re the ones who refuse to be lulled into numbness.
They’re the ones who treat democracy not as a spectator sport but a living organism.
They’re the ones who see the cracks in a system and say, “Okay then—let’s plant something in the cracks.”
You’ve met them, even if you didn’t realize it.
And they’re the elders who held the flame long before the rest of us woke up.
What these people share isn’t ideology. It’s agency.
They understand that rebellion doesn’t have to be dramatic.
It just has to be intentional.
Rebellion today is less about marching with rifles and more about refusing to outsource your conscience. It’s choosing a life that increases the freedom of others, not just your own convenience. It’s crafting systems where dignity is the default state, not a luxury product.
The Americanas Zapatistas are rebuilding what empire compromised:
The belief that ordinary people hold extraordinary power—if we choose to act together.
They remind us that every system has leverage points, and some of the smallest changes—our choices, our conversations, our commitments—can create ripples that outlive us. They understand that being a good ancestor is not a poetic aspiration. It’s a daily practice.
These rebels don’t aim to burn the world down.
They aim to re-architect it.
To rebel today is to ask the 13th question—the question no one else thought to ask. It’s to recognize that the future isn’t waiting to arrive; it’s waiting to be authored.
So when we ask, “Who rebels?”—the answer is simple:
Americanas Zapatistas aren’t a demographic. They’re a verb.
And if you’re feeling that spark right now—the one humming behind your ribs—that’s your cue. That’s your mask without a mask. That’s your invitation to step into the lineage of people who didn’t wait for permission to make a freer world.
The question is no longer “Who rebels?”
The real question is:
“Will you?”
No necesitamos zapatos donde vamos!
We Don’t Need No Shoes! Where We’re Going!”
The Determination, Commitment, and Courage of the Post-Modern Americanas Zapatistas Movement
Imagine this:
you’re standing at the edge of a future no one has mapped yet. No guidebook. No well-trodden path. Just raw land—the kind of land that doesn’t ask for your credentials, your bloodline, or your permission. And right as you’re about to take your first step, someone asks, *“Aren’t you going to put on your shoes?”*
Shoes are for the old world—where roadways were paved for someone else’s comfort, where rebels were expected to walk quietly, neatly, politely. Shoes are for systems designed to keep your feet clean while your soul stays dirty.
But the Americanas Zapatistas?
Who are these post-modern Americanas Zapatistas?
They’re the inheritors of rebellion, but not the imitators of it.
They are a fusion of ideologies:
Think of them as a new species of protagonist—one who doesn’t wait for permission, one who understands history but refuses to be confined by it, one who builds systems not to dominate but to liberate.
Courage here isn’t loud.
It’s not screaming in the streets for the sake of spectacle—though sometimes it is.
More often, courage looks like:
Their courage is not accidental. It’s cultivated.
Like maize. Like memory. Like rebellion itself.
Now, when I say “determination,”
I don’t mean nostalgia dressed up as resistance.
I mean a gritty, forward-leaning, prototype-driven determination.
This movement understands something crucial:
**You don’t overthrow systems by screaming at them—you make them irrelevant.**
So they build:
Not as escape routes, but as replacements.
As living proof that another world already exists—it’s just unevenly distributed
Walking without shoes is not a gesture.
It’s a philosophy.
It says:
“We are willing to feel the earth. We are willing to be wounded. We are willing to be changed by the impact of our own steps.”
This is commitment:
Not the commitment of comfort, but the commitment of consequence.
The Americanas Zapatistas are not “Americans”
in the narrow nationalist sense.
Their America stretches from Nunavut to Patagonia, from the desert to the rainforest, from the barrios to the bayous.
**To live as if liberation is not a dream but a duty.**
Where are we going?
A future that demands:
We’re heading to a place where dignity isn’t a luxury item,
where autonomy isn’t exotic,
where community isn’t an afterthought—
it’s the DNA of everything.
And to get there…
Shoes will only slow us down.
So when we say,
*“No necesitamos zapatos donde vamos,”*
We *will* walk it barefoot—
because the future deserves our full contact.
Thank you.